To be eligible for meaningful use incentives, healthcare providers must use “certified” EHR Technology. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology is responsible for issuing the rules that establish the standards EHR Technology must meet to be certified and therefore eligible for meaningful use incentives. ONC also appoints technology review bodies authorized to test and certify EHR Technology for compliance with ONC standards.
Many healthcare providers have found that implementing EHR Technology can be an expensive and time-consuming process. In addition to purchasing costly certified EHR Technology that will qualify for meaningful use incentives, providers also find that the day-to-day implementation comes with its share of headaches as staff and providers learn to use a new system effectively. Now, healthcare providers must confront an additional concern: ensuring that their EHR Technology remains certified under evolving ONC standards.
On April 25, 2013, ONC issued a press release announcing the decertification of two EHR Technology systems. This announcement sent shockwaves through the industry, as it was the first time that ONC decertified EHR Technology that initially met ONC standards. The two decertified EHR Technology systems were developed by a company based in Santa Fe Springs, California. After complaints were allegedly made to ONC about the products, ONC investigated and the products were retested for certification by InfoGard Laboratories, one of the ONC’s authorized certification bodies. Based on the results of the retest, the EHR Technology was decertified and is no longer eligible for meaningful use incentives.
What happens to a healthcare provider’s substantial EHR Technology investment and meaningful use incentives when previously certified EHR Technology does not continue to meet ONC standards? It seems that, at least for now, the answer to this is unknown. There is an array of questions that arise in the wake of ONC’s recent action, such as:
• Are providers entitled to keep meaningful use payments received based upon the previous certification?
• Do providers have any legal rights against an EHR vendor whose product loses its certification?
• What rights do vendors have once their product becomes decertified? Is there an appeal process? If so, what effect will it have on providers who are left in limbo with the product?
We will have to wait and see how this situation develops in the coming months. In the meantime, check back later, and I’ll offer some tips on what a provider should look for when they purchase an EHR system.
Clay B. Wortham
McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC